We are pursuing cashless in the wrong direction!

Human civilizations have endured multiple evolutions over thousands of years, empires were built and crumbled along the way, but the presence of trade existed in one form or another. Bartering, the very fundamental of trade which brought about development and prosperity to mankind was cashless, as goods were exchanged and not bought.

Fast forward today, bartering takes on a different form where goods were paid for with money, a universal medium of financial exchange. As we moved from traditional bartering to precious metals than to banknotes and now towards digital payments, our medium of financial exchange is evolving to facilitate the shift in our environment and the advancement of technology.

The pursuit of a cashless society has been ongoing for several years, with technology companies introducing cutting age devices which allow for digital payment with the attempt of replacing money, financial institutions going digital and government initiatives to encourage citizens to adopt digital payments as part of a holistic movement towards a cashless society. One may wonder, what defines a cashless society and what impact it’ll have to our society?

In today’s term, a cashless society is described as an economic state whereby financial transactions are not conducted with money in physical form (banknotes or coins) but rather through the transfer of digital information. Advocates saw the potential in digital transactions as it allows for quicker transactions regardless of location and not limited by time which empowers individuals with access to financial services. This prompted small businesses and basic trades to occur in developing areas where banking infrastructures and robust regulations were lacking. Digital payments allow for full traceability of transactions, pointing tax regulators in the right direction to crackdown on tax evasion, security forces to track terrorism funding, money laundering, corruption, and many other financial crimes(although there are ways around it through the dark web, and cryptocurrencies-Monero). Going cashless also helps in reducing cost towards maintaining the circulation of paper currency and allowing the government to have better control over the flow of money when in times of crisis intervening to implement damage control initiatives.

The macro benefits of a cashless society are obvious, however does going cashless on a micro level truly benefit end users?

Continue Reading

ICOs déjà vu of the dot com bubble?

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme as Mark Twain famously quoted. The current climate as observed in cryptocurrency certainly bears a striking resemblance of the 2000s dot com crash.

374 Initial Public Offering (IPOs) (US$84.63billion*) and 541 IPOs (US$111.78billions*) were sold in 1998 and 1999 respectively, prior to the dot com crash in 2000. Currently, 46 Initial Coin Offering (ICOs) (US$96millions) and 139 ICOs (US$2.1billions) were sold in 2016 and 2017 (as of 31st August 2017) respectively. Witnessing a huge increase in coins offering for a wide variety of uses. This inevitably draws our attention to ICOs and its underlying technology. *values as of 2017, adjusted for inflation

ICOs have been around for a couple of years now, most notably with Ethereum raising funds through the sale of Ether to fund the development of the Ethereum platform. This has all been good, where developers with exceptionally good ideas raise funds to build out their product. However in recent years, ICOs are getting lots of attention from entrepreneurs and opportunists as an alternative form of raising capital, bypassing traditional financing methods (equity/debt financing). With 867 cryptocurrencies and counting (as of 31 August 2017), each advocating on a big idea that would revolutionize an industry. From coins for data storage to payments for writers, cryptocurrencies were introduced into the market and funding crowdsourced from both sophisticated and non-sophisticated investors through intense marketing campaigns. This presents real risks to the startup/investing community as traditional financing not only provides capital to new companies, but stringent due diligence will be conducted and terms are incorporated into contracts to ensure the viability of their business models and instill discipline to entrepreneurs running their businesses. With fundraising bypassing these investors and to the wider community (crowdfunding) the lack of insight and due diligence towards the companies raising funds, while also being misled by the marketing materials produced, retail investors are not in the position to make informed decisions with their investments.

Continue Reading