Do Startups really need Venture Capital ?

In almost every loss-making unicorn’s pitch to prospective investors, there has to be an Amazon comparison — how long they took to become profitable and how they became the most valuable company in the world.

But how many of them are really similar to Amazon? Are we even comparing apples to apples or is it just a convenient excuse that founders use to justify their investment?

Or, is it a case of the blind leading the blind, where VCs themselves do not know how to accurately identify value generating companies or are blinded by their presumed knowledge and understanding of the market?

Is it a game of luck or pure skills in selecting the right company to back?

Continue Reading

Competition is for losers

Image result for competition

 

That Eureka moment! When you’ve conceived a brilliant idea you felt could change the world. Only to realize that there are several other companies working on the same idea, or 3 months into developing your idea, you realize that MNCs are out-executing you distributing it throughout its extensive channels. Starting a company in this digital age has become more challenging, as information gets disseminated very quickly, competitors will be made aware of your new technology before its ready for commercialization.

The key to survive is to out-execute your competitors inorder to build an unassailable lead against them and monopolize the market. Google came in late to the search industry, but with laser focus to improve on its core competency (search algorithm) they provided the best search results and experience to users, and in the process gained an edge over the incumbents (Yahoo, Altavista, AOL, etc). Companies would always portray themselves in a position where there are operating in a competitive market to build good public relations, Google positioned itself as a tech company, competing against Apple, Facebook, etc. However, in reality, Google has dominated the search market for nearly a decade and in the process accumulated a huge amount of resources which enables the company to pursue other projects. Politicians would try to breakup monopolies to give consumers better value for money, as it is common consensus that competition drives down prices.

Competition destroys value

As a new company starting out, it is best to avoid competition within your market to allow your company to capture the value that it has created. For example, U.S. airline companies serve millions of passengers and create hundreds of billions of dollars of value each year. However fore ever $100 value created, these companies only capture 25cents of profit.  Comparing to Google, which creates less value but captures far more. Approximately 100times more where Google brought in 50billion dollars and had a 21% profit margin.  That makes Google so profitable and is worth three times more than every U.S. airline combined. The airlines compete with each other, but Google stands alone. Thus every company’s dream is to monopolize the market that they operate in. When companies compete, they lose value as resources were spent to out-compete each other in every aspect of the business (e.g. marketing, R&D, sales, etc). Many would argue that competition is healthy as it promotes a vibrant ecosystem, encourages innovation and brings value for money products to consumers. These are legitimate reasons for competition, however, it occurs at the expense of the company. Being a startup with limited human and capital resources, entering into a competition will stifle the growth of your company. Uber, started off as a very successful private hire platform in San Francisco depleted its resources as it pursues global domination. It had to sell off its Asia(China & SEA) business to its competitor, along with raising a down round (decrease in valuation) from Softbank as clear signs of the company failing to capture value that it has created due to competition.

Continue Reading